> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:mendola@bigfoot.com]
>
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > instead. Because it was impossible to make REINDEX transaction-safe
> > then, such flag was needed to suppress inconsistency as less
> > as possible.
>
> This mean that the actual REINDEX is not transaction-safe ?
No.
It was not transaction-safe long time ago.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue