Re: Comparing databases
От | Ned Lilly |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comparing databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00c801c3a914$a7aabb10$ceea1943@Ned обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Comparing databases (Jussi Mikkola <jussi.mikkola@bonware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Comparing databases
Re: Comparing databases Re: Comparing databases Re: Comparing databases |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> > I thought about both of these points, but didn't really come up with better > > wording... i think the proper sound bite is that "support companies have come > > and gone but postgresql continues on" > > How about, 'There have been instances in past where companies with postgresql as > sole core business strategy have failed. but postgresql project continued > (relatively) unaffected' > > Give and take tense and plural/singulars. Talk about weasel wording..:-) All I'm saying is that from the outside, IMHO, it just creates more problems than it solves. To use a favorite metaphorfrom this list, PHB's will read that and smell instability. I repeat, why volunteer it? Just say there are manyfirms providing support today, and it's used at X, Y, and Z companies.
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: