Re: [HACKERS] UTF-8 support

----- Original Message -----
From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 10:47 PM

> > My question is now how many BE's/FE's would you return encodings for?
>
> I don't quite understand your question. What I thought were something
> like this:
>
> SELECT pg_available_encodings();
> pg_available_encodings
> ----------------------
> SQL_ASCII
> EUC_JP
> EUC_CN
> EUC_KR
> EUC_TW
> UNICODE
> MULE_INTERNAL
> LATIN1
> LATIN2
> LATIN3
> LATIN4
> LATIN5
> KOI8
> WIN
> ALT
> SJIS
> BIG5
> WIN1250

Which ones belong to the backend and which ones to the frontend?
Or even more: which ones belong to the backend, which ones
to the frontend #1, which ones to the frontend #2, etc...

For examle, I have two fronends:

FE1: UNICODE,  WIN1251
FE2: KOI8, UNICODE
BE: UNICODE, LATIN1, ALT

Which ones SELECT pg_available_encodings(); will show?
The ones of the BE and the FE making the request?

In case I need to communicate with BE using one common
encoding between the two if it is available.

> BTW, another question comes to my mind. Why don't we make available
> this kind of information by ordinaly tables or views, rather than by
> functions?  It would be more flexible and easy to use.

Sounds like a good idea, make another system table for encodings
and NLS stuff...

S.