Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness

Ah doh - I thought it was catching it returning a boolean.  I'll fix and
resubmit.

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Conway" <mail@joeconway.com>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_reset() weirdness


> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression
> > failure.  Is this because it's returning a bool I guess?  Shall I just
fix
> > the regression test to exclude this function?
>
>
>  >         AND p1.proname != 'update_pg_pwd_and_pg_group';
>  >    oid  |    proname
>  > ! ------+---------------
>  > !  2249 | pg_stat_reset
>  > ! (1 row)
>
> Likely because this is now in CVS:
>
> DATA(insert OID = 2249 ( record        PGNSP PGUID  4 t p t \054 0 0
> oidin oidout          i p f 0 -1 0 _null_ _null_ ));
> #define RECORDOID               2249
>
> The Oids conflict.
>
> Joe
>