Re: Open Source Database Routs Competition in New Benchmark Tests
От | Mitch Vincent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Open Source Database Routs Competition in New Benchmark Tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00b401c006de$52975650$0200000a@doot обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Open Source Database Routs Competition in New Benchmark Tests (merlin <merlin@sixdegrees.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
There are a thousand RDBMS products that might fall under that heading, the reason the names weren't published is that most commercial RDBMS product prohibit the publishing of benchmarks when you buy it. The guys that did this benchmark weren't trying to hide who it was just for the sake of hiding it, they really can't *legally* say. I know some people that have benchmarked Oracle and PostgreSQL... Oracle won, that's all I'll say.. People still need to use whatever RDBMS makes their life easier, one could make an argument for virtually all existing products (commercial or not) on that product's individual strengths and weaknesses. -Mitch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Poul L. Christiansen" <plc@faroenet.fo> To: "merlin" <merlin@sixdegrees.com> Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open Source Database Routs Competition in New Benchmark Tests > Is "Uracle" called "Proprietary 1" or "Proprietary 2"? I can't remember :-) > > And which other RDBMS is proprietary? Could it be M$ql Server....? > > Hint, hint > Poul L. Christiansen > > merlin wrote: > > > Given all this performance discussion, has anyone seen any numbersregarding the > > speed of PostgreSQl vs Oracle? > > > > Thanks. > > - Brandon > > > > -- > > sixdegrees.com > > w 212.375.2688 > > c 917.723.1981 > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: