Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

Hi Marko-san.

Great thanks!!
Please correct one mistake of mine...sorry.
This patch solved problem of win32.:-)

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>


> On 7/28/08, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/25/08, Hiroshi Saito <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
>>  >  I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still
>>  > required.
>>  >  http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/
>>  >  However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me.
>>  >  Regards,
>>  >  Hiroshi Saito
>>
>> Thanks, I applied the patch to CVS, with minor changes:
>>  - Use HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H instead of WIN32 for <sys/select.h>
>>  - Do SHLIB_LINK += instead of separate var.
>>
>>  Could you please test the attached patch or CVS HEAD,
>>  whether everything works fine now?
> 
> One more change - I replaced __attribute__((dllimport)) with PGDLLIMPORT,
> which seems more standard.
> 
> -- 
> marko
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers