On Friday, December 28, 2012 1:38 PM Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello, I saw this patch and confirmed that
>
> - Coding style looks good.
> - Appliable onto HEAD.
> - Some mis-codings are fixed.
>
> And took the performance figures for 4 types of modification versus 2
> benchmarks.
>
> As a whole, this patch brings very large gain in its effective range -
> e.g. updates of relatively small portions in a tuple, but negligible
> loss of performance is observed outside of its effective range on the
> test machine. I suppose the losses will be emphasized by the more
> higher performance of seq write of WAL devices
Thank you very much for the review.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.