Re: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch
От | Joseph |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00a201c08582$79e18780$d564640a@workstation18 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
I would like too. Where can I get the compiled version? Joseph ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> To: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>; <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org>; "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:24 PM Subject: [ODBC] Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch > > Applied, with comment about changes need for V3. > > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > I am waiting for someone to comment on this. Anyone? > > > > > > Seems like we need a policy decision: do we want to try to be ODBC v2 or > > > v3? I don't know what else we might have to change if we want to be > > > v3-compliant, so that seems like a risky way to proceed right before > > > a release ... > > > > Are we breaking anything by losing the v3-compliancy at this point? The > > patch is small, so should be brain-dead to reverse at a later date *if* we > > aren't breaking anything by applying it now ... > > > > > > > > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 > >
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: