Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 009e01c24053$6376aba0$0200a8c0@SOL обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_stat_reset() weirdness ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hang on - I _can't_ fix the function defiition - it returns a bool and that's why it's failing. I can't have it returning a void because it's not possible. Check list of all other excluded functions as well... Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:50 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_reset() weirdness > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > > If you apply the pg_stat_reset() function patch you get this regression > > failure. Is this because it's returning a bool I guess? Shall I just fix > > the regression test to exclude this function? > > No, you should fix the function definition. The sanity checks are there > for a reason. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: