Re: indexes are fucked

Language reflects the character of those who use it.

In this case, the language used also reflects on the community to which it
is directed.

I don't wish to be associated with a "professional" community, such as
Postgre, that holds such shallow values.

Bob Pawley


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards@gmail.com>
To: "Dr NoName" <spamacct11@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Ragnar Hafstað" <gnari@simnet.is>; <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] indexes are fucked


On 8/2/05, Dr NoName <spamacct11@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks Ragnar. That solved the problem. I still would
> like some explanation about this voodoo. Most
> importantly, how can I estimage a "good" statistics
> number?
>
> thanks,
>
> Eugene

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/planner-stats.html

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly