Re: indexes are fucked
От | Bob Pawley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: indexes are fucked |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 009b01c597a1$d88ac8b0$ac1d4318@OWNER обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: indexes are fucked (Dr NoName <spamacct11@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: indexes are fucked
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Language reflects the character of those who use it. In this case, the language used also reflects on the community to which it is directed. I don't wish to be associated with a "professional" community, such as Postgre, that holds such shallow values. Bob Pawley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards@gmail.com> To: "Dr NoName" <spamacct11@yahoo.com> Cc: "Ragnar Hafstað" <gnari@simnet.is>; <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 12:57 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] indexes are fucked On 8/2/05, Dr NoName <spamacct11@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks Ragnar. That solved the problem. I still would > like some explanation about this voodoo. Most > importantly, how can I estimage a "good" statistics > number? > > thanks, > > Eugene http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/planner-stats.html -- regards, Jaime Casanova (DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: