Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Дата
Msg-id 009901c0f472$829e85d0$d7d310ac@jecw2k1
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>
> Too late ;-).  I just finished ripping out the unneeded parts and
> applying.


Thanks! I take it I still need to do the documentation though ;)


>
> I made a few minor changes too, mostly removing unnecessary code
> (you don't need to call nameout, everyone else just uses NameStr)
> and trying to line up stylistically with other code.  One actual
> bug noted: you were doing this in a couple of places:
>

Once again, thanks for the "important safety tips". I saw references to this
trap in the comments, and therefore should have known better. I guess only
practice makes perfect (hopefully!).

-- Joe



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [PATCHES] Fw: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole - Solution Proposal