I think it is because of the MSB order. Would it be implemented as LSB, I'm
sure the high byte would be the one to be padded :)
G.
--
while (!asleep()) sheep++;
---------------------------- cut here ------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Luc Lachance" <jllachan@nsd.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 7:39 PM
> It is unintuitive to me that the low byte be padded. Shouldn't it be
> the high byte?
>
> JLL
>
> Joe Conway wrote:
> > * bitdata -- bit string, most significant byte first