Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 008a01c21f23$87553560$0200a8c0@SOL обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sure? I don't see it. In fact, I only see it in the 'SQL92 features we don't have section'. http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-createview.html Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 2:57 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] mistake in sql99 compatibility? > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but the > > TODO says we don't... > > TODO updated. Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs. > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: