Re: elog() proposal
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: elog() proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 008901c1bc8f$54ecb9f0$8001a8c0@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: elog() proposal (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
How about 'perdition'? Perhaps not common enough, but it seems to describe the situation pretty well. If you know the word it's way worse than fatal. Complete destruction, loss, ruin... -- Rod Taylor This message represents the official view of the voices in my head ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart@fourpalms.org> Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>; "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 12:04 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] elog() proposal > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes: > > I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name. > > Proposals then? What's been used or bandied about so far are > "REALLYFATAL" (yuck, even though I take the blame for it). > "STOP" (Vadim put this in, but I object to it as being too vague; > it's not at all obvious that it's worse than FATAL). > "FATALALL" (also yuck). > > Surely we can find something that's short, memorable, and clearly > a notch more fatal than FATAL. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: