Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
| От | Darko Prenosil |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 008701c37584$f1f9aaf0$8087bfd5@darko обсуждение исходный текст |
| Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>; "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>; "PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32@postgresql.org> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [PATCHES] MinGW patch > Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > > Why does configure need to see those files? Surely you don't need > > > configure to test the capabilities of our own source tree? > > > > Looking at the contents of src/include/port/win32, I would imagine the > > problem is configure will decide we don't HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H, etc. > > Yep. Can anyone suggest a better solution? > I am seeing problem with HAVE_RL_FILENAME_COMPLETION_FUNCTION also on my system. When I manually remove it from pg_config.h, psql compiles OK. Regards !
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: