Re: Release, 3rd draft
От | Michael Paesold |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Release, 3rd draft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 008501c5c913$4af59fe0$0f01a8c0@zaphod обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Release, 3rd draft (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Release, 3rd draft
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Didn't someone mention something like 2 000 000 beta downloads for 5.0? If > so, that an avg of 153k per beta ... with that many testers, is their code > *that* bad that they can't find all the bugs quicker then that? Their release model is quite different, there is no such thing as a feature freeze until about beta 10. Until about beta 5 most features that should be in the final product are still missing. After beta, there are gamma relases, which rather matche our betas. MySQL beta software is so successul because those are the only releases having some of the required features. And using the current stable version would mean that your software will be completly incompatible to the next release (see e.g. their changes to the TIMESTAMP type from 4 to 4.1). ;-)) Although there is *some* truth in all this rant. Best Regards, Michael Paesold
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: