Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction status"

Tom Lane wrote:

> Having seen a couple recent reports of "could not access status of
> transaction" for old, not-obviously-corrupt transaction numbers, I went
> looking to see if I could find a way that the system could truncate CLOG
> before it's really marked all occurrences of old transaction numbers as
> known-dead or known-good.
>
> I found one.

I was starting to wonder about those reports, too. Actually I was thinking 
about bringing this up as soon as I would find time. So I am glad you picked 
that up yourself -- and found a problem already.

> I think what we ought to do to solve this problem permanently is to stop
...
>
> Comments?

Well, I am not able to comment here, but I can say I usually trust your 
judgement.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold