Is it allowed to declare a cursor in this manner??
Declare
procgraphic cursor for select p_id.p_id.process_id from p_id.p_id,
processes_count
where p_id.p_id.p_id_id = processes_count.p_id_id;
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Bob Pawley" <rjpawley@shaw.ca>
Cc: "PostgreSQL" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Cursor Error
> "Bob Pawley" <rjpawley@shaw.ca> writes:
>> Right.
>> This is the cursor statement.
>
>> Open procgraphic for select p_id.p_id.process_id from p_id.p_id,
>> processes_count
>> where p_id.p_id.p_id_id = processes_count.p_id_id;
>
> Sorry, we're not bright enough to handle WHERE CURRENT OF on a join
> --- per the fine manual,
>
> The cursor must be a simple (non-join, non-aggregate) query on
> the UPDATE's target table.
>
> I don't recall offhand whether there's some deep technical reason
> for the restriction against joins, or we just didn't get around to
> it. In any case, you'll need to change the cursor to return the
> table's primary key and use that to target the UPDATE.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general