Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 007301cdb747$1d155230$573ff690$@kapila@huawei.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 3:25 AM Josh Berkus > > I should think that doing this requires heading back towards there > > being a single unique configuration stream, and over the course of > > several versions, deprecating the INCLUDE directive. > > Oh, maybe I should take a closer look at Amit's proposal then. I > thought we planned to make use of the INCLUDE facility for SET > PERSISTENT, including supporting include-if-exists. Possibly what he's > proposing and what I thought our last consensus were are highly > divergent. Currently INCLUDE is used for including postgresql.conf.auto in postgresql.conf by default. Can you please let me know what is the expectation? Instead of INCLUDE, 1. include-if-exists can be used. 2. In code first read .auto file then .conf and override the values read from .auto by values from .conf. With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: