Re: doubts about a constraint's definition
От | enediel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: doubts about a constraint's definition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 007201c2efcf$454b0b90$2824a8c0@nsoft обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | doubts about a constraint's definition ("enediel" <enediel@com.ith.tur.cu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
thanks Eric for the answer, but the question is how to keep the information's integrity without convert strings to upper case. I need to do that transparent to the user Greetings Enediel Linux user 300141 Happy who can penetrate the secret causes of the things ¡Use Linux! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Déchaux" <edechaux@irci.fr> To: "enediel" <enediel@com.ith.tur.cu> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 6:14 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] doubts about a constraint's definition Hello, I think you can 'upcase' the string written by the user before inserting it into the table. Le Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:08:32 -0800 "enediel" <enediel@com.ith.tur.cu> a ecrit : >Hello: >I've the following question: > >I need to create a column, where the information is conserved in the same >way that it was written by the user, but the data of this column is unique >if it's only taken to capital > >declaring a constraint >... unique(column name) is not enough to me 'cause > >'ab' >'AB' >'aB' >.... >will be accepted > > > > > >Thanks in advance for any help >Enediel >Linux user 300141 > >Happy who can penetrate the secret causes of the things >¡Use Linux! > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate >subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your >message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Eric Déchaux IRCI 87 rue Bizet 94800 Villejuif Tel Poste : +33 (0) 1 47 26 71 03 Tel Standard : +33 (0) 1 47 26 37 73 Email : edechaux@irci.fr
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: