Re: Command names
От | Adam Lang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Command names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 007201c02959$ab662480$330a0a0a@Adam обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Command names ("Keith L. Musser" <kmusser@idisys.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Command names
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I'd assume a problem with changing all the commands now is that it may break a lot of people's scripts and programs. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith L. Musser" <kmusser@idisys.com> To: "PGSQL-General" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:39 AM Subject: [GENERAL] Command names I know all of you are accustomed to the command line interface for pgsql. (Of course, some of you created it!) However, I'd be interested if anyone else feels the way I do.... I would prefer to have a consistent set of names for the commands. For example, I propose the following: Instead of this use this. ---------------------------------------------------- createdb pg_createdb createuser pg_createuser destroydb pg_destroydb initdb pg_initdb initlocation pg_initlocation pgaccess pg_accessgui pgadmin pg_admin pg_dump pg_dump pg_dumpall pg_dumpall postgres pg_single postmaster pg_master psql pg_access vacuumdb pg_vacuumdb ??? pg_help (list all these commands) Not that it is terribly difficult the way it is. But I simply think that a consistent set of names would help new users, and help to prevent conflicts with other commands in the PATH. Any comments? - Keith Keith L. Musser Integrated Dynamics, Inc. 812-371-7777 email: kmusser@idisys.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: