Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 006801c2c95c$15a208b0$1a01000a@rduadunstan2 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Copeland" <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> > I'm confused as to whether you are being sarcastic or truly seem to > think there is a distinction here. Simple question, does MySQL require > the cygwin dll's (or statically linked to) to run? > > If the answer is yes, then there is little question that they are as > "emulated" as is the current PostgreSQL/Win32 effort. > > Care to expand on exactly what you believe the distinction is? ...or > did I miss the humor boat? :( I just installed it (their latest gama), to see what was there (and uninstalled it straight away ;-). There was a cygwinb19.dll (I think that's what it was called) installed. In any case, if we are talking about "industrial strength", is this the comparison we should be using? ;-) andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: