> I think the better question about all of this is:
> What is the problem we are trying to solve?
> Providing solutions that are looking for problems doesn't help us.
> Sincerely,
Perhaps the current codebase and design in C will serve us for years and
years to come. In fact there is no doubt about that and switching to an OO
design is no easy task. But times change and technologies evolve. So should
any software solution that is hoping to continue and compete with other
competitors of the same kind.
Procedural programming languages like C may have been languages of choice
for many years but they gradually loose developer audience just because of
the reason above. I am afraid PG is no exception here.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> --
> The PostgreSQL Company since 1997:
> http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community
> Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
> United States PostgreSQL Association:
> http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
> (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>