Why are selects so slow on large tables, even when indexed?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Wille
Тема Why are selects so slow on large tables, even when indexed?
Дата
Msg-id 005d01c1d51c$8dc89d20$0864a8c0@zucchini
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Why are selects so slow on large tables, even when  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Список pgsql-general
To test PostgreSQL's scalability, I created a table with approximately 76M rows. The table had four columns: a bigint, a varchar(32), another bigint and a varchar(80). The first three columns were filled with values, the fourth was left null. After populating the table, I created an index on the first column (a non-unique index, as the column contains duplicate values) and then VACUUMed. Select statements involving only the indexed column are pathetically slow (tens of minutes). Some examples:
 
select count(*) from a where id < 0; /* returns 0 rows */
select * from a where id=5;    /* returns a handful of rows */
 
76M rows is a lot, but it shouldn't be that bad when id is indexed.
 
Attached are two scripts. One creates the table, the other populates it. I typed "create index index_a on a(id)" and "vacuum" by hand. I see this behavior both on Windows and RedHat Linux using PostgreSQL version 7.1.3 in both cases. Any idea why the performance is so poor? Can this be corrected by tuning?
 

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От:
Дата:
Сообщение: data sets
Следующее
От: "David Stanaway"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [SQL] resetting sequence