Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
От | Gordan Bobic |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 005801c0ffac$403a6340$800010ac@localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL (Alex Knight <knight@phunc.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> ...This is not the same in my book, since I don't care > to run RHL in any kind of production environment... No idea what you're talking about. I've been running RH 24/7 in various places for various tasks, including routers, and production servers, and I've never had a problem. I've been running it since RH 5.0. Stability is not an issue, because it's Linux. Security is also not an issue if you configure your system properly and follow and read security and other advisories from the RH site and other security related sites. RH are usually reasonably good with keeping reasonably up to date with patches and updates. Please, tell us all of your experiences to the contrary. Were they caused by slapping on a default installation and hoping that it would "just work"? If you have a good argument, then I certainly don't want to run an inferior distribution - I accept that the fact that I haven't discovered the shortcomings over the last few years doesn't mean that they are not there... Regards. Gordan
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: