Re: pg_dump.options.diff

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Serguei Mokhov
Тема Re: pg_dump.options.diff
Дата
Msg-id 005701c2b2b1$8e923fe0$0301a8c0@gunnymede.lan
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pg_dump.options.diff  ("Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov@cs.concordia.ca>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump.options.diff  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sent: January 02, 2003 3:20 PM

> > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
> > #define xo(long,short,desc)  printf("%s %s\n", long, desc)
> > #else
> > #define xo(long,short,desc)  printf("%s %s\n", short, desc)
> > #endif
>
> > seems relatively generic, so it could be used by more than one tool.
>
> But there's no good place to put it.  I'd say just stick it into each
> tool; it's no worse than repeating the existence of a "usage()"
> subroutine in each tool.

It ended up being in dumputils.h

Attached a patch for pg_dump(all) and pg_restore eliminating dupes
in option descriptions as per above xo "technology".

Please review and apply if there are no too many objections.

thank you,
-s

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in pg_get_constraintdef (for deferrable constraints)
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Password Cracker