Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written
От | Ned Lilly |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Draft #5 -- radically re-written |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 005501c35633$6112d1d0$0800a8c0@desktop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Draft #5 -- radically re-written (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Few more comments on the comments on the comments: > > > SQL-STANDARD ERROR FRAMEWORK: The PostgreSQL Team has completely > > > redesigned error logging and reporting, providing developers with an > > > "SQL-STANDARD ERROR FRAMEWORK: Completely redesigned ..." > > > > > REORGANIZED AND EXPANDED DOCUMENTATION: The documentation contributors > > > have completely reorganized and added many new pages to the online > > > REORGANIZED AND EXPANDED DOCUMENTATION: Completely reorganized and > > significantly expanded online documentation, making it easier for > > > > EXPLICIT JOIN REWRITING: Core developer Tom Lane has included an option > > > for explicit join rewriting by the query planner, easing the transition > > > "EXPLICIT JOIN REWRITING: An extremely powerful option for power users, > > which allows explicit ..." > > The thing I don't like about Ned's phrasing is that the paragraphs lack a > verb, making them more passive and less grabbing. What do other people > think? That's executive bullet-point-speak, as well as a former life as an editor coming through. Trouble with real sentences is,you have to come up with a subject each time (e.g. Tom, the only core developer mentioned by name). > > Dunno if we add that much, but you're welcome to add "ERP software vendor > > OpenMFG" to the list. > > Cool! Please verify that that's official; I don't know your position in the > company. President and CEO ;-) Cheers, Ned
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: