Re: 7.4 features list
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.4 features list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 005001c3141e$612190f0$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.4 features list ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: 7.4 features list
Re: 7.4 features list |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Apart from the already known issue of corruption on power loss (which ought to be soluble - presumably the commercial heavyweights don't suffer from this problem), I can't see any reason to have low expectations of the w32 port. My experience, and apparently that of others, running the PeerDirect port, has been entirely painfree. I understand people's feelings about this - I'm a Unix kinda guy myself, and will choose some flavor of it every time if given the choice. Often, I don't have a choice, for a variety of reasons, some good and some not. That's why the W32 port is important. andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>; "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 features list > "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes: > > And, we don't have to say we fully support win32 in 7.4, we can call it > > experimental or whatever. > > That might be a wise move in any case. Management of expectations and > all that ;-) > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: