>
> "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> >> Log message:
> >> Seems like a bad idea that REINDEX TABLE supports (or
> >> thinks it does)
> >> reindexing system tables without ignoring system
> >> indexes,
>
> > Why ?
>
> I'd ask the question the other way: why would it be a good
> idea to allow
> this in REINDEX TABLE and not in the other two cases? And
> did it really
> work?
Yes. I would revert your change.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue