Re: beta testing version
От | Gary MacDougall |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta testing version |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 004c01c05d9e$89314f60$0400a8c0@gary обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta testing version (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: beta testing version
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'm agreeing with the people like SePICK and erServer. I'm only being sort of cheeky in saying that they wouldn't have had a product had it not been for the Open Source that they are leveraging off of. Making money? I don't know what they're plans are, but at some point I would fully expect *someone* to make money. ----- Original Message ----- From: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy@hub.org> To: "Gary MacDougall" <gary@freeportweb.com> Cc: "mlw" <markw@mohawksoft.com>; "Hannu Krosing" <hannu@tm.ee>; "Thomas Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>; "Don Baccus" <dhogaza@pacifier.com>; "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 7:53 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version > On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Gary MacDougall wrote: > > > > If you write a program which stands on its own, takes no work from > > > uncompensated parties, then you have the unambiguous right to do what > > > ever you want. > > > > Thats a given. > > okay, then now I'm confused ... neither SePICK or erServer are derived > from uncompensated parties ... they work over top of PgSQL, but are not > integrated into them, nor have required any changes to PgSQL in order to > make it work ... > > ... so, where is this whole outcry coming from? > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: