От: Balazs Wellisch
Тема: Hardware performance
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 004b01c34c0f$256bfb80$0600a8c0@home01
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответы: Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway)
Re: Hardware performance  (Vincent van Leeuwen)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

Hardware performance  ("Balazs Wellisch", )
 Re: Hardware performance  ("Roman Fail", )
  Re: Hardware performance  (Ron Johnson, )
 Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
  Re: Hardware performance  (Hannu Krosing, )
   Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
    Re: Hardware performance  (Adam Witney, )
     Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
      Re: Hardware performance  (Adam Witney, )
       Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
       Re: Hardware performance  (Jord Tanner, )
       Re: Hardware performance  (Robert Creager, )
    Re: Hardware performance  (Andrew Sullivan, )
 Re: Hardware performance  (Vincent van Leeuwen, )
 Re: Hardware performance  (Jean-Luc Lachance, )
  Re: Hardware performance  (Joe Conway, )
 Re: Hardware performance  (Jean-Luc Lachance, )
 Re: Hardware performance  ("Magnus Hagander", )
  Re: Hardware performance  (Ron Johnson, )
 Re: Hardware performance  ("Magnus Hagander", )

Hi all,
 
first of all I'd like to thank everyone who responded to my earlier post. I have a much better understanding of postgres performance tuning now. In case anyone's interested we've decided to go with RH9 and PostgreSQL 7.3 and we'll do the OS and DB tuning ourselves. (should be a good learning experience)
 
We are now getting ready to purchase the hardware that will be used to run the database server. We're spending quite a bit of money on it because this will eventually, if things go well within two months, become a production server. We're getting all RH certified hardware from Dell. (Dell 2650)
 
We're now stuck on the question of what type of RAID configuration to use for this server. RAID 5 offers the best fault tolerance but doesn't perform all that well. RAID 10 offers much better performance, but no hot swap. Or should we not use RAID at all. I know that ideally the log (WAL) files should reside on a separate disk from the rest of the DB. Should we use 4 separate drives instead? One for the OS, one for data, one for WAL, one for swap? Or RAID 10 for everything plus 1 drive for WAL? Or RAID 5 for everything?
 
We have the budget for 5 drives. Does anyone have any real world experience with what hard drive configuration works best for postgres? This is going to be a dedicated DB server. There are going to be a large number of transactions being written to the database. (Information is logged from a separate app through ODBC to postgres) And there will be some moderately complex queries run concurrently to present this information in the form of various reports on the web. (The app server is a separate machine and will connect to the DB through JDBC to create the HTML reports)
 
Any thoughts, ideas, comments would be appreciated.
 
Thank you,
 
Balazs Wellisch
Neu Solutions
 

В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hardware performance
От: Fabian Kreitner
Дата:
Сообщение: index / sequential scan problem