Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 004b01c1582f$38deb070$8201a8c0@inspiron обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
The one issue I have with a non ant based build system is that it makes it difficult to build the driver on a windows machine. Currently I can build the driver on windows without using cygwin What problems does ant present? Dave -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut Sent: October 18, 2001 5:04 PM To: Barry Lind Cc: Marko Kreen; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org; pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [JDBC] [PATCHES] Ant configuration Barry Lind writes: > I don't like this patch. If anything I think we should remove the > dependency on ANT, not remove the dependency on make. The use of Ant originally seemed attractive because it would solve the detection of the jdk version, the portable invocation of the compiler, and the dependency generation. However, I must currently consider this experiment a failure, because for each problem Ant solves it introduces a load of worse problems into the system. Thus, if we can agree to work out a configure/make-based system for the next release I would be very much for it. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: