Re: relation model vs SQL1999 conformance vs PostgreSQL
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: relation model vs SQL1999 conformance vs PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 004a01c32f50$336c98b0$1401010a@Xeon обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | relation model vs SQL1999 conformance vs PostgreSQL (<alvis@piladzi-2.biz>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
hello me, Since I am able to search archives (plus reading your docs), I have found answers to almost all of my questions. albeit attempt to invoke spirits failed. Looks like I rised too much general questions, indecent for pgsql-general@postgresql.org list ;-). anyway Postgres documentation is great! Regards, Alvis ----- Original Message ----- From: <alvis@piladzi-2.biz> To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 6:06 AM Subject: relation model vs SQL1999 conformance vs PostgreSQL > hello all, > > In general my question to all PostgreSQL community is stated in the subject > line. > Looks like I am missing something 'cause I am new to this list, but I don't > see much info > on this subject in your web page. > Perhaps the only information I have found is in v.7.4 dev. documents about > SQL1999 conformace. > How much from SQL1999 are you going to implement? > (I mean in the long run, say any plans for next 3 years, kind of TODO > lists?) > As far as I see there are features (i.e. kind of array support) in > PostgreSQL that are implemented looong before SQL99. > Do you feel you have to conform to SQL99 for marketing considerations? or > else? > I don't know nothing about any conformance tests for SQL99, kind of strange? > > In particular I am interested how do you feel about REF type (or using > pointers) to join tables. > Any pointers to additional information on the subject will be highly > appreciated. > Hope it is right list for these questions. > > > Regards, > Alvis Tunkelis >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: