Re: Huge Data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthew Lunnon
Тема Re: Huge Data
Дата
Msg-id 003f01c3da9d$46419690$8e8bbd3e@rwanet.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Huge Data  (Sezai YILMAZ <sezai.yilmaz@pro-g.com.tr>)
Ответы Re: Huge Data  (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@myrealbox.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Have you run 'vacuum analyze log;'? Also I believe that in Oracle count(1) used to be quicker than count(*).
Matthew
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Huge Data

Richard Huxton wrote:

>PG uses MVCC to manage concurrency. A downside of this is that to verify the
>exact number of rows in a table you have to visit them all.
>
>There's plenty on this in the archives, and probably the FAQ too.
>
>What are you using the count() for?
>

>

select logid, agentid, logbody from log where logid=3000000;

this query also returns after about 120 seconds. The table log has about
7 million records, and logid is the primary key of log table. What about
that? Why is it too slow?

-sezai


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

_____________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.mci.com

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Shridhar Daithankar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Huge Data
Следующее
От: Shridhar Daithankar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Huge Data