Re: Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL?
От | Mitch Vincent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003e01c0f9c5$afee2fb0$1251000a@Mitch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL? (Adam Rossi <adam.rossi@platinumsolutions.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
It's surely based on something else. If it's not, it's initial release probably won't be worth anything.. I was surprised to see that they didn't mention what it was based on however I'm sure we'll find out soon.... Redhat will probably wrap up PG or Interbase and sell it with a support contract... Oh wait, they did that before with something -- what could that be? *thinks* :-) -Mitch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Rossi" <adam.rossi@platinumsolutions.com> To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:39 PM Subject: [GENERAL] Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL? > It looks like Red Hat has announced an open source database called Red Hat > Database: > > (via slashdot:) > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20010619/tc/red_hat_to_play_in_oracle_s_aren a_1.html > > Why is this not PostgreSQL? Why can't the Red Hat folks sell support to > PostgreSQL, rather than developing another open source database and > supporting that? Is it a conflict with GreatBridge? This looks like it could > have been a great opportunity for PostgreSQL.... > > - Adam > > -- > Adam Rossi > President, PlatinumSolutions, Inc. > adam.rossi@platinumsolutions.com > http://www.platinumsolutions.com > P.O. Box 31 Oakton, VA 22124 > PH: 703.471.9793 FAX: 703.471.7140 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: