Re: meta data information returned for domains
От | Iain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: meta data information returned for domains |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003d01c4db7e$c1e50330$7201a8c0@mst1x5r347kymb обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | meta data information returned for domains ("Iain" <iain@mst.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: meta data information returned for domains
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi Kris > 1111 = Types.OTHER. We could consider resolving domains to their base > types and reporting that as the sql type. That seems like it would be > helpful in this situation. I figured this one out sometime later :-) I ignored Types.OTHER when I originaly wrote the code on the basis that I didn't know what it was for - always a mistake. >> So far I've tried using the "SOURCE_DATA_TYPE" column of the result set >> returned by getColumns but this column doesn't exist. > > This is an addition in the JDBC 3 spec that we haven't gotten around to > adding as right now we only return JDBC 2 info. This obviously makes my > previous suggestion obsolete and we should just implement this. This > looks like a pretty easy thing to do except for the fact that we haven't > yet dealt with how to return different information for JDBC 2/3 drivers > without a lot of code duplication. If I can use getUDT I'll be satisfied with that for the time being, but SOURCE_DATA_TYPE would certainly be much more convenient. I expect this question has been asked before but is there any reason why I shouldn't use the newer driver (for v8) with 7.4.6? I assume that it would allow me to use the getUDT method if I did that. Thanks Iain
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: