Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003c01c30f79$013b0350$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ? (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Attribute must be GROUPed.... ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> > > I see... How should the "shall" term be considered ? I don't have much > > knowledge of the SQL specs language. > > "In the Syntax Rules, the term shall defines conditions that are > required to be true of syntactically conforming SQL language." > > I think most people would write "must", although I think "shall" might be > more correct. > This is common usage in requirements docs - I suspect it has a government, perhaps a military origin. Even after vetting and helping to author a great many requirements docs it still makes me cringe, but then I don't split infinitives either ;-) andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: