Re: pg_dump.options.diff

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Serguei Mokhov
Тема Re: pg_dump.options.diff
Дата
Msg-id 003b01c2b22a$62be3b80$0301a8c0@gunnymede.lan
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pg_dump.options.diff  ("Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov@cs.concordia.ca>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump.options.diff  (Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sent: January 02, 2003 1:34 AM

> Perhaps it would work better to do something like
> 
> #ifdef HAVE_GETOPT_LONG
> char* f_option = _("-f, --file=FILENAME     ");
> ... etc ...
> #else /* not HAVE_GETOPT_LONG */
> char* f_option = _("-f FILENAME             ");
> ... etc ...
> #endif /* not HAVE_GETOPT_LONG */
> 
> printf(_("  %s output file name\n"), f_option);
> ... etc ...
> 
> That seems to reduce the amount of duplication without breaking things
> up into chunks that aren't independent concepts.

Thank you for your comment, Tom.

A slightly more readable version of the above could be:

> #ifdef HAVE_GETOPT_LONG
> char* data_only_option = _("-f, --file=FILENAME     ");
> char* blobs_option = _("-b, --blobs         ");
> ... etc ...
> #else /* not HAVE_GETOPT_LONG */
> char* data_only_option = _("-f FILENAME             ");
> char* blobs_option = _("-b                 ");
> ... etc ...
> #endif /* not HAVE_GETOPT_LONG */
> 
> printf(_("  %s output file name\n"), data_only_option);
> printf(_("  %s include large objects in dump\n"), blobs_option);
> ... etc ...

It loos like better than the current setup.
Either way, something has to be donw about this...

-s



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Cast your vote ...
Следующее
От: Daniel Kalchev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Cast your vote ...