Re: Inverted result set, why?
От | Byron Nikolaidis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inverted result set, why? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003901bfe238$f2603320$6401a8c0@byron обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Inverted result set, why? (jeam@themail.com) |
Ответы |
Re: Inverted result set, why?
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
If you want a specific order based on the time, you could add a timestamp field to the table that would default to the current time when the record was inserted (see create table...default...) . Then you can "order by" on the timestamp, either ascending or descending if desired. Byron ----- Original Message ----- From: <jeam@themail.com> To: <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 7:30 AM Subject: [INTERFACES] Inverted result set, why? > > Hi there, > > Using the psql utility I insert three records into a 6.5.3 postgresql table with or without indexes. I SELECT * and the records are retrieved in the order I inserted them, and that's correct. > > However, if I SELECT the records from a Delphi 5 application, using the BDE and the latest ODBC driver, the result set is inverted, i.e., on the same index key, the last record I inserted is listed first and so on. > > This forces me to use an index even for tables I don't need one. Or worse yet, I need to create a second, auxiliary field on the table and add it to the index when I have one in order to get the proper order of the inserted records. > > I don't know if I should blame Borland's BDE or the ODBC driver. > > Any clues about this problem? > > Thanks in advance, > > Jorge. > __________________________________________________________________ > Make A Buck Or Two @ TheMail.com - Free Internet Email > Sign-up today at http://www.themail.com/ref.htm?ref=908313 > > >
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: