Re: rule problem
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: rule problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003801c1d446$28163db0$6501a8c0@calvin обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: rule problem (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
There is only one thing I cannotprotect myself from is my own stupidity ! Tx very much to remind me that :-)))))) thomas, -- Thomas SMETS rue J. Wytsmanstraat 62 1050 Bruxelles yahoo-id : smetsthomas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Wieck" <janwieck@yahoo.com> To: <tsmets@brutele.be> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: 25 March, 2002 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] rule problem > tsmets@brutele.be wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > I thought I could do smthg like : > > do instead > > begin work > > Action_1; > > Action_2; > > Action_3; > > commit work > > > > Could some one suggest a better solution ? > > I have never seen what happens if I set multiple rules. > > Are they applied in the order they were created ? > > You cannot and don't need to do BEGIN and COMMIT as rule > actions. Write it as > > do instead > ( > Action_1; > Action_2; > Action_3; > ); > > and the actions will be perfomed in that order, all in one > and the same transaction. > > > Jan > > -- > > #======================================================================# > # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # > # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # > #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com # > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: