Re: rule problem

There is only one thing I cannotprotect myself from is my own stupidity !
Tx very much to remind me that

:-))))))

thomas,


--
Thomas SMETS
rue J. Wytsmanstraat 62
1050 Bruxelles
yahoo-id : smetsthomas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Wieck" <janwieck@yahoo.com>
To: <tsmets@brutele.be>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: 25 March, 2002 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] rule problem


> tsmets@brutele.be wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I thought I could do smthg like :
> > do instead
> >     begin work
> >         Action_1;
> >         Action_2;
> >         Action_3;
> >     commit work
> >
> > Could some one suggest a better solution ?
> > I have never seen what happens if I set multiple rules.
> > Are they applied in the order they were created ?
>
>     You  cannot  and  don't  need  to do BEGIN and COMMIT as rule
>     actions.  Write it as
>
>         do instead
>         (
>             Action_1;
>             Action_2;
>             Action_3;
>         );
>
>     and the actions will be perfomed in that order,  all  in  one
>     and the same transaction.
>
>
> Jan
>
> --
>
> #======================================================================#
> # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
> # Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
> #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
>
> Do You Yahoo!?
>
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>