Re: RESULT_OID Bug
От | Kevin McArthur |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RESULT_OID Bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 003701c592e7$ec3f76d0$0701a8c0@kdesktop обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RESULT_OID Bug (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It is the only one that currently appears to _for this bug_. Kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> To: <andrew@supernews.com> Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:57 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RESULT_OID Bug > > > Andrew - Supernews wrote: > >>On 2005-07-27, Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> wrote: >> >>>So far the problem does seem to be specific to whatever PL/pgSQL's >>>is doing, and it affects ROW_COUNT as well as RESULT_OID. I haven't >>>been able to reproduce the problem with PL/Tcl or with C and SPI. >>> >> >>src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c, function exec_stmt_getdiag, uninitialized >>variable "isnull". >> >> > > nice catch. I see the "= false" removed in about 5 places in this change: > http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c.diff?r1=1.146;r2=1.147 > > Is this the only one that matters? > > cheers > > (another) andrew > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: