Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting]
От | Michael Paesold |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 002d01c26e24$af3cca70$4201a8c0@beeblebrox обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table spaces again [was Re: Threaded Sorting] ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> wrote: [snip] > On 7 Oct 2002 at 15:52, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote: [snip] > > With tablespaces you can assign 30mb to use a, 120mb to user b etc. ... > > Table spaces are a nice abstraction layer to the file system. > > Hmm.. And how does that fit in database metaphor? What practical use is that? I > can't imagine as I am a developer and not a DBA. Virtual hosting at ISP's for example. > I believe giving each database it's own transaction log would be a great > advantage of this scheme. Well, if you think of Tom's recent patch (ganged WAL writes), from a performance point of view, this would only be good if each transaction log had it's own disk. Otherwise a single transaction log is still better. I think tablespaces is a good idea. I also prefer associating tablespaces with directory structures better over the oracle style. Regards, Michael Paesold
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: