Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
От | Adam Lang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 002901c04fd3$cb1ad140$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL (joseph@randomnetworks.com) |
Список | pgsql-general |
It is possible. I think the problems were arising before the currentpatch. Problems involved not properly releasing conenctions and they were eventually filling up as used. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Tassell" <ctassell@isn.net> To: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL > Just a note, I've been using Postgres 7.02 and PHP 4.02 or 4.03 for about a > month in a couple sites, and haven't experienced any problems with > persistent connections. Problem might have been fixed in one of the point > releases, or maybe I just don't have enough different db connections to > trigger it. > > > At 02:05 PM 11/15/00, Adam Lang wrote: > >PHP 4 was having problems with persistent connections (not sure if with just > >pgsql or all dbs). Maybe that is why they didn't use it. > > > >Adam Lang > >Systems Engineer > >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: <joseph@randomnetworks.com> > >To: "carl garland" <carlhgarland@hotmail.com> > >Cc: <martin@math.unl.edu.ar>; <RDNELSON@co.centre.pa.us>; > ><davidb@vectormath.com>; <mfork@toledolink.com>; <poulc@cs.auc.dk>; > ><pgsql-general@postgresql.org>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > >Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:28 PM > >Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, carl garland wrote: > > > > > > # >perhaps why, even at 5 clients, the page views he shows never went > > > # >significantly above 10/sec? > > > # > > > # I think alot of it has to do with the web server/db setup not pg. They > >are > > > # using Apache/PHP and looking at their code every page has the additional > > > # overhead of making the db connection. Now if they had used AOLserver > >with > > > # its persistent db connecction pooling scheme they may have faired better > >;) > > > > > > I haven't actually looked at their code they used to test with to > > > see if they are actually using it, but Apache/PHP has the ability to do > > > persistent db connections. I would be surprised that someone like Tim ( > > > who seems to have done a fair bit of php with db stuff) would not make use > > > of such a feature. > > > > > > If you can point out an example of where they are not using this > > > feature I will gladly stand corrected. > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > | Joseph Scott The Office Of Water Programs | > > > | joseph@randomnetworks.com joseph.scott@owp.csus.edu | > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: