Fw: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
От | Kane Tao |
---|---|
Тема | Fw: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 002701bf3520$6bbc6e80$040101c0@p2400arcane обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-general |
From: K.Tao <khtao@yahoo.com> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: Jochen Topf <pgsql-general@mail.remote.org>; <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 12:38 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? > Well I do apologize as all my experiences are in the use of pre 6.5 > versions...I assume there have no longer been any reports of databases > having to be rebuilt or restored from tape from the way you are talking ;) > > Although I still feel that the level of expertise for an admin on a Unix > platform running PostgreSQL is much higher than lets say Oracle on NT. One > example is if you cancel out of a admin process like vacuum while in pgsql. > U have to have enough exp to know what files to go and delete to be able to > get pgsql back up and running. > > I do think that the commercial support program moves PostgreSQL much closer > to being a database I would choose. I havent had the requirement for that > support, but I am sure if I had a large system utilizing PostgreSQL I would > not hesitate to pay to make sure 24x7 I can get the database back up and > runniog within 15 mins of it going down :) > > I also do like the sound of getting rid of vacuum and its table locks. > Anythng to make the database more self administering and self recovering is > good ;) > > > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: