Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?

Hi,

> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
>> You solve it by allowing other backends to lock and examine your
>> temporary tables. But AIUI temporary tables are not stored in shared
>> memory so how do you get a consistant view of it?
>
>> Not unsolvable, but very tricky.
>
> Right, the problem isn't that "it can't be done", it's that "it can't be
> done without giving up most of the performance advantages of temp tables".
> Which seems like a bad tradeoff, at least to me ...

Ah, now I understand the problem :-)

And I think you are right. It would be a very bad tradeoff.
Sander