Re: [mail] Re: 7.4 Wishlist
От | Al Sutton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [mail] Re: 7.4 Wishlist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001f01c2a071$243580f0$0100a8c0@cloud обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 7.4 Wishlist ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: [mail] Re: 7.4 Wishlist
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Would it be possible to make compression an optional thing, with the default being off? I'm in a position that many others may be in where the link between my app server and my database server isn't the bottleneck, and thus any time spent by the CPU performing compression and decompression tasks is CPU time that is in effect wasted. If a database is handling numerous small queries/updates and the request/response packets are compressed individually, then the overhead of compression and decompression may result in slower performance compared to leaving the request/response packets uncompressed. Al. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Copeland" <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> To: "Stephen L." <jleelim@hotmail.com> Cc: "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist > On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 09:36, Stephen L. wrote: > > 6. Compression between client/server interface like in MySQL > > > > Mammoth is supposed to be donating their compression efforts back to > this project, or so I've been told. I'm not exactly sure of their > time-line as I've slept since my last conversation with them. The > initial feedback that I've gotten back from them on this subject is that > the compression has been working wonderfully for them with excellent > results. IIRC, in their last official release, they announced their > compression implementation. So, I'd think that it would be available > for 7.4 of 7.5 time frame. > > > -- > Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> > Copeland Computer Consulting > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: