On 2017/09/15 1:37, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 14 September 2017 at 06:43, Amit Langote
>>> Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> Attached updated patch.
>>
>> @@ -1222,151 +1209,130 @@ PartitionDispatch *
>> RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo(Relation rel,
>> int
>> *num_parted, List **leaf_part_oids)
>> {
>> + List *pdlist;
>> PartitionDispatchData **pd;
>>
>> + get_partition_dispatch_recurse(rel, NULL, &pdlist, leaf_part_oids);
>>
>> Above, pdlist is passed uninitialized. And then inside
>> get_partition_dispatch_recurse(), it is used here :
>> *pds = lappend(*pds, pd);
>>
>> --------
>>
>> pg_indent says more alignments needed. For e.g. gettext_noop() call
>> below needs to be aligned:
>> pd->tupmap = convert_tuples_by_name(RelationGetDescr(parent),
>> tupdesc,
>> gettext_noop("could not convert row type"));
>>
>> --------
>>
>> Other than that, the patch looks good to me. I verified that the leaf
>> oids are ordered exaclty in the order of the UPDATE subplans output.
>
> Committed with fixes for those issues and a few other cosmetic changes.
Thanks Amit for the review and Robert for committing.
Regards,
Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers