Re: PITR Dead horse?
От | Nicolai Tufar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PITR Dead horse? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 001901c3ec0e$67ac53b0$de00a8c0@ntufar обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PITR Dead horse? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:02 AM > To: ntufar@pisem.net; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? > Of course, but I would argue that my claim that PostgreSQL is reliable > is backed up by the lack of people posting messages like 'we had a > powercut and now my DB is hosed'. It's not like that. It's more like 'what will happen if we had a powercut/ disk failure/cpu failure/memory failure, etc, etc.' and that answer I have to give is 'why, there is PITR of course!'. No other answer will pass in enterprise world. Those people are not open-minded, they'd rather be safe than sorry. > > Do they have specific problems with the reliability of PostgreSQL then? > Perhaps you could post details of how things have gone wrong for them > (assuming you haven't already - I don't recall anything on -hackers > recently). Nothing remarkable. PostgreSQL just works. Bu as I said before, In enterprise world, good sleep at night is treasured above all. > Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: