Re: CREATE MODULE (was: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names)
| От | Mark Hollomon |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CREATE MODULE (was: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 00111320335400.12247@jupiter обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CREATE MODULE (was: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC'
function language names)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Saturday 11 November 2000 20:30, Tom Lane wrote: > Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes: > > > Might even be able to implement a 'CREATE MODULE' which loads an > > object, enquires about functions in the module, and creates function > > entries based on information returned from pg_fmgr_info... > > That could work ... something to think about for the future, anyway. I proposed this some time ago, even wrote up a semiformal proposal. I was told at the time it was a bad idea. The only objection I remember of the top of my head had to do with set-uid. I apporached the other way. LOAD MODULE would call a well defined entry point which could then use SPI or some other facility to create whatever. I saw it as a way to distribute types and even whole applications. -- Mark Hollomon
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: