Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
От | Mark Hollomon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00110922241000.00334@jupiter обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 08 November 2000 10:15, Tom Lane wrote: > > At 14:04 7/11/00 -0500, Jan Wieck wrote: > >> FWIW, what about having another "template0" database, where > >> nobody can add user data. Initially, template0 and template1 > >> are identically. CREATE DATABASE get's a new switch (used by > >> the pg_dump output) that tells to create it from the vanilla > >> template0 DB (generalized, so someone can setup a couple of > >> template<n>'s) and all objects inherited from template1 > >> (those not in template0) are regularly dumped per database. > > I like that a lot. Solves the whole problem at a stroke, and even > adds some extra functionality (alternate templates). > How does this solve the 'ALTER FUNCTION' problem? -- Mark Hollomon
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: